Goodreads Doesn't Have It, Data Migration: Corruptible
What a nightmare. This is riddled with corruption and hypocrisy. Calling people peasant while saying people high on their power and identifying unduly as aristocracy unable to create anything of any real value are exactly who is too narcissistic to be in positions of power. How do they not see their own hypocrisy? Self-awareness that low is dangerous. Just constant “good boy/bad boy” based threats from stunted moral development, trying to speak on things they are not even remotely there enough to speak on. Literally still struggling with zero sum, which is way lower down the line of failure to achieve self-consistency mastery. Blackmailing, etc. It's just a work of rationalization for data-extracting surveillance deals that ultimately go to line the pockets of the corrupt surveiller, like Zuckerberg's surveillance arguments that somehow magically fund Libra where it is trying to "emperor" him into existence when in fact he shows primitive sexual jealousy, rapacious exploitation, and extreme corruptibility. Brian Klaas's book serves as a support for these rationalizations of centralization of surveillance which then are corrupted by people trying to monetize the data like Zuckerberg and the ongoing Libra attempts to split whole countries wide and put an autistic behaviorism that works for him and not others on them. I've noticed autistics really like the evolutionary psychology content, meanwhile most of the academic world is increasingly noticing its low self-consistency and speculative reliance. It's a glorified rationalization of antisocial behavior based on speculation of "what might've happened" while normalizing a zero sum that is proven to have a collapsing effect on intelligence and infrastructure. They're projecting their low level of moral development on everyone else. They're in the "good boy, bad boy" zone with all the attendant struggles with glamorizing and normalizing antisocial behavior with evolutionary psychology as a backup for it. The whole thing is just a glamorized insecure leader's attempt to normalize blackmail, threats, splitting up because they can't actually keep anything together through sheer competence. For example, Chapter 12 is just a glorified excuse to centralize ironically the very thing that creates corruption. We live in an era where this centralized surveillance has applied itself pathetically enough to casual social media websites like where you go to just speak to your friends is now just a play field for Zuckerberg to "govern" on. Literally just move off of it and his great Ceasar attempt is over. His work with Libra shows that it's not about governance and he is the corrupt one, that he can't handle his power and gets way too high on people just casually opting in on using his platform. This book reads and sounds like it was practically written by him. Crap like that is what made these alleged ten billion dollar deals with the Chinese get cut for surveillance that rotted out American infrastructure in a fit of paranoia. They basically paid for their own infrastructure to be hacked, and narratives like this helped them along. China is a known nightmare of repression, aggression, and very envious people who fall into violent narcissistic rages when anybody sufficiently narcissistically injured them in the CCP. All of Chapter 12 is just someone projecting their stunted moral development on everyone else like it's true of everyone else. Ironically having a centralized surveillance like that just leads to corruption. It's just someone with an incidental position, they just happen to own a social media people go on, getting high on their power and trying to justify their position using increasingly discredited evolutionary psychology that was only used in the Nazi era and was the primary rationalization of the "bay boy" counterpoint to the "good boy" of a low moral development stance. The irony is these people usually lack the intelligence to understand the motives of people higher up on moral development, misinterpret it without being qualified to interpret it all still very much stuck in surveillance and behaviorism "good boy/bad boy" culture and try to bring them back down in to "good boy, bad boy" behaviorism of moral development thinking somehow this moral rung is superior and everybody needs their higher order stuff to make sense to them. Yet, they never themselves move up, just drag everyone down until it makes sense. It really reads like someone who hasn't read about the Chinese and understand how bad their repression is acting like the Chinese's dog. Somebody this behind to the point they're still struggling with a clearly speculative and self-inconsistent field is in no place to be watching anybody. They even use backwards judicial processes like they're something to look up. "Justice by God" this and that "by God", "by God". It's well established that the court system is kept secular to avoid intelligence failures and religious warring. And yet they're bringing back medieval blackmailing, terrorism, aggression, and other issues with a clearly religious, Old Testament/Yahweh crying bent. I just can't with this book.
Here's a massive self-contradiction, showing when they make these financial assignments its based on them being unable to recognize basic things due to a huge preformal logic reliance. For instance, the local corrupt court cites "preponderance" but when asked can't even define the logical rigor of preponderance and consistently flunks it, then expects this flunking logic to do anything other than create ongoing preformal logic flunking. We're talking illegal and deceptive surveillance practices that deserve to be met with the same deceptive strategies to out-deceive them; people who corrupt spaces to gather information deserve corrupted information. They are not smarter than the public if they're stuck in good boy/bad boy stunted moral development zones. They literally are stuck in carrot-and-stick dog behaviorism trying to govern people who have long ago transcended all that. "How are you going to have "the survival of the fittest", then realize that incentivizes narcissism, and then try to actively select for people who save more lives by being less corrupt that don't engage in that narcissism? How are you going to identify the power adverse incorruptible when you actively turn people down for coverage postmortem because they didn't engage in the high earnings narcissistic fields?" Their self-consistency of logic is too low to be speaking on incorruptibility. Low self-consistency is itself corruption. Their self-consistency is way too low to be speaking on incorruptibility. And yet here they are, trying to speak on it like they're in any way a master with self-contradiction that damn bad.
In any case only someone really struggling with an intelligence failure finds parasitism from corrupted surveillance more intelligent than their sources. They are desperate for any reason to keep being parasites. It is on those who have a basic understanding of why parasitism is bad to remove corrupted surveillance features that have come to resemble the Chinese, where people are afraid to create something new to avoid the envious wrath of the local CCP narcissist and where the CCP's China is a hotspot for IP violation and the disincentivization of the original work in favor of the parasitic, unsustainable extractor who collapses his local economy, the local creativity, and ultimately his world.
Older notes as I was reading: Dang, the Kung are abusive. Lying about how good the meat was. Even the early Natives made their own Clovis for themselves, there weren't any signs that the Clovis was shared between families so the families could take the credit. Can you imagine a whole culture where they're just gaslighting the hunter about how good they did and then taking credit because they owned an arrow point and probably couldn't even make that themselves? It takes 0 dollars to do fact-based praised like, "Yeah, Kung Jr. brought in the whole mammoth there." Why would you stay with anybody that gaslights you about your skill like that? Just nuts. I would have straight up left the family for being gaslighting ungrateful trash. How are you going to be a good hunter and normalize and allow gaslighting like that? Your whole perception's going to start breaking and you're going to lose all your skill because you don't even know if you're looking at a mammath or a shrub because your trash family's gaslight the crap out of you and your perception doesn't even work anymore.
Yep, the first thing they start with is how American police are Nigeria level quality taking bribes and turning the other way for murder for hire contracts and things like that. Probably be surprised by the number of departments in various states and countries that should just relocate to Nigeria for better business. Seriously, if you're a buyer or you're a police officer involved with any of this, relocate to Nigeria for more efficient action and better business. Don't bring this psychopathic lunatic crap here.
Associative reasoning, preformal logic. I can't. It's so bad. They are in a stunted moral development and trying to pass moral judgments on people who have mastered logical self-consistency and can clearly explicate what it is while they themselves can do no such thing and their logic is riddled with a low self-consistency feature. Meanwhile they are extracting data from people that want nothing to do with them and convincing themselves it's personal just for using a platform, and also trying to speak on logic and self-consistency while still being deeply stuck in a "they remind me of" absolutely stunted preformal logic and then taking action on a sheer similarity impression. It's so stunted. It is not qualified to be leading anything. I just can't. It is really this bad. Please stop speaking on incorruptibility when your self-consistency is that low. That IS what corruption is. That is EXACTLY what corruption is at the root. I can't take the self-awareness that low. I just can't.
This is exactly what the journalism and coverage on Mark Zuckerberg reflects he believes. Yet somehow it doesn’t have his name on it. The only thing it got right is it’s sick in the head to surveil people who aren’t in power and those who encourage surveillance should be the primary subject of this surveillance because they’re projecting their inability to be moral without behaviorism and surveillance on others. It's so pathetic. I really just can't. They're stealing wages from people, extracting data without compensating them and then creating a monetized product, and then putting this on those who are clear victims of the white collar crime of people like Zuckerberg. If it were actually true and only those with the highest money who are the highest endorses of surveillance got the most surveillance and behaviorism for projecting on everyone, we would be fine. But it's not. They have no self-control. They're doing this to people in abject poverty. They need to be put out of their hypocritical misery and removed from power in favor of someone who doesn't run on terrorism, blackmail, paranoia, white collar crime, and human trafficking. It even shows his telltale sign of glamorizing decapitation from his glorified teenage rage fits found in a grown, adult male well past the appropriateness his teenage rage fit years.