Review of Credible by Deborah Tuerkheimer
TW: R*pe
Credible is a really fantastic book, but it smells to high heaven of illegal publication pipelines. A book that even floats the concept that Weinstein is a 10 and his victim is a 0, even in terms of power which incels view beauty to be (if that were true nobody beautiful would ever be homeless, even though homeless is the opposite of homely) really is very confused. Also being like “I need money” incentivizes the need, as opposite to the synergy, economy. Ultimately someone is being drained unsustainably somewhere in there. That can never be ethical ultimately. In either case, if this is the case and illegal investigations into victims (Tucson, Minnesota—I have never lived in Minnesota, just have a Minnesota phone number, San Francisco, Washington, then Missoula), and I mean ILLEGAL investigations aren’t going anywhere so are instead sold are being used in an illegal publication pipeline, I need this exposed and investigated. You should not be talking about victim compensation in your book while knowing you have paid all these illegal investigation victims $0. It’s like someone who repeatedly calls the police with false accusations of prostitution because they themselves did not get sexual access to the person. They cannot do that as many times as they want, and the abnormal hate on such a person for that female victim is usually cause for institutionalization.
This publication pipeline thing has to stop. It’s not a smooth move. It’s not a compromise when the victims were still not involved. It’s not an evil but genius way to make money. It needs to go. It needs to be investigated. I can’t investigate all these horrifying things by myself.
In either case, if it had not stunk to high heaven of this, I would have given it four stars. Instead I am giving it three. This really stinks to high heaven of illegal Weinstein (he’s with Israel, the Zionists I believe) trying to monetize the situation of a pro-Palestine supporter to “profit” in illegal data to publication pipelines. Freedom by Angela Merkel no less showed signs of this too. This is not ok. The victims need to be compensated. This is not a money-making enterprise. No narrative will rationalize this and make it better. Data is not on a publication pipeline like gasoline. This is not the lesser of two evils, and if it is going to fund a mismanaged war that is even worse. This has been going on way too long. If I didn’t know better, Poland and Ukraine saying no to Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 is getting them targetted essentially for “get out of the way” exterminationism. This is a no. If that’s Deutsche, you investigate Deutsche. Deutsche needs to stop saying they’re doing things for their own financial wellbeing that then come back and destroy the entire international economic system. They clearly do not have the comprehension. This ceased to be ok or ethical a long time ago. You can stand there and try to convince yourself it’s ethical all day, it doesn’t make it ethical. Deutsche is not Merkel. You can love Germany for Merkel, and absolutely want to vomit at Deutsche. Deutsche gave Merkel a hard time getting a bailout for the very country after which it is named. Since. When. And yet, they have disparate arms in near schizophrenic self-contradiction that continue to fund Trump. They have unreasonable hate that fails to take criticism with any grace and ultimately their decisions have led to this worldwide ongoing catastrophe, where Covid-19 was clearly behind much of Trump’s collapsing cholesterol style economic world flunking.
Another thing is; When a black man is charged with rape even when a white woman didn’t come forward about it there are two possibilities A) She was legitimately not raped and wanted to correct the record. He did not deserve it. He got enthusiastic, mutual consent. If he tries to rationalize later any act that went wrong in a way that is violating of her agency, it is possible that rape dynamics were at play but it is still the decision of the victim to exonerate. The continued efforts to act above her and make the decision for her say everything about projective identification by a white rapist who doesn’t respect her agency and decisionmaking, and would likely rape her himself if he felt her no was too obstructive to his sexual motives. B) She felt pressured due to his identity to not report the rape and was actually raped. There is a lot of this pressure out there. As the book states, “lynching” was used to get black women—usually the first to come to the aid of black men—to not report. Mostly everybody acknowledged that as absurd. He deserved it.
If you do not respect when it is A, you are the real rapist in the room. You don’t respect her ability to evaluate and judge the situation for herself. You are desperate for your narrative. If you do respect when it is A, but not when it is B, you are benevolently racist. If you respect both when reported by separate sovereign agents in at least similar situations, you are genuinely aligned with their agency and are not involved with the dynamics of rape. Nobody gets to decide if someone was raped except the victim. If they don’t feel ready to come forward, it can be either A or B. You need to listen to them about what they say. The rest sounds like sexual possession that is undue and can’t accept the outcome. That’s a no. Overt KKK homophilia is too stunted from an intelligence perspective to be anywhere near here. The obsession with black men even potentially raping white women is so pathetic it is just embarrassing. But when it happens, it should be believed without further taxing the victim when it happens in a way that is clearly devoid of possessive delusions based on feelings of being unable to compete sexually or feelings of economic devaluation suggesting the person legitimately views the individual as property or real estate. That’s also a no. Running an investigation on a victim, monetizing and providing no victim compensation is a needs based economy and you should NOT speak on victim compensation in your book if you have done this knowledgeably and voluntarily. You are triply raping the victim. If they know the individual felt raped on the stand and recreate the dynamics that made them feel that way, or know that the victim cut their hair under certain circumstances and then try to recreate the circumstances that made that happen, they need to be investigated and removed for some sort of impulse disorder that precludes them from being able to work with this material. That may repetitions just needs to go. Similarly, the fact such an exam was medical but then had no gloves is just a no. Who even makes that argument but a fraud. (pg. 91)
“Don’t mix alcohol and beauty” is just a no, when other people have a cover up that the person wasn’t even attractive enough to be believed. You can’t have both. And when they say this, they mean one drink, and it’s her fault for being beautiful. The only person that would normalize this argument is someone with an impulse control disorder who immediately already evaluates that they’re not going to have any control over themselves so immediately puts it on the victim. Such a person needs a caregiver, a paid caregiver, not a partner. Can you believe that? People really disgusting enough to devalue and attack the person's looks as part of the premeditation of rape. A repulsive form of insurance. "Who would rape you anyway?" then the police officer won't let you have one drink because "Don't mix alcohol with beauty." I just can't. It's just rape on a whole other dimension.
It reminds me of what was said about Gates in terms of coercive control in the abuse of his wife in the divorce. Oh, you don't want to fix your car door? Let me bust in where you put your screw that makes it driveable so you can't drive it so you're forced to fix it. Oh you taught yourself and fixed it yourself? I'll destroy the whole car. I'll call the police on you. Then it's someone you've NEVER. EVEN. PARTNERED. WITH. ONE. TIME. This person CLEARLY does not respect their agency and is trying to force their actions. Their calculations on savings are from a white male perspective that clearly has never had a domestic violence white male like themselves watching every move making horrific agency-destroying coercive control behaviors like that. Oh, you don't want to get yourself a new coat or you got that coat or that book for free? Oh, I'll make you pay for it. I'll stab it so you're forced to get a new one because you shouldn't get a coat like that for that price. They're this disgusting. They're this repulsive. Don't. Underestimate. How. Ugly. The trafficker energy. Is. Even if they look good, even if they spend millions on plastic surgery, they are fundamentally on the most repulsive energy you will ever see. They are more than capable of that. That is a no. That is clear contempt for that person's agency. It's a no. Coercive control's got to go. You've got to f*ck off now. Bye bye.
Hysteria is often a response to rape. It can be low key or high key. I feel like Merkel’s response to Bush’s ongoing harassment was not only trying to convince herself but also a lowkey hysteric response to how she couldn’t stop it. Like Terence Tao spending lots of time trying to convince himself his out of control violation of certain people’s data is ethical, Merkel spends a lot of time in her book Freedom saying that people didn’t really know the dynamics between her and Bush and that it was ok and it didn’t really bother her. This does huge damage to people in similar situations, if not the exact same situation, who actually meant it. She undermined other women doing this. I am trying to feel better about it by floating it might be a pseudohysterical response. But betraying other women is not ok, which there is already a slight unpleasant whiff of when she struggles to say she's feminist. Same with how she treats Ivanka with contempt. People say it's a German thing, to view beautiful people as ways to make money pushing the stereotype of "German infertility" where they see beauty and just think "EXPLOIT" instead of respect and cherish, but I don't know. I don't think it is necessarily. They seem like one and the same type of dynamic, a pseudohysterical attempt to publicly convince themselves primarily.
Those who return to work seem undamaged so they get a larger paycheck. I really appreciate that Turkheimer agrees that this shows all the signs that they went back to work because they had to, not because they wanted to. “Many knew, and few did anything to stop him.” with R. Kelly is the real issue. While people just sit back, they vote implicitly that their worst self is actually behind what happened here. That should never be forgotten, and it should be removed.
“Dragging” was also used. This is usually a vocabulary word for war crimes. That anybody would even describe someone turning to them for help and justice with being met with a war crime speaks on true repulsiveness. Pg. 180 Constant betrayal by loved ones is especially hard for people where normality has been successfully upheld and preserved to accept. The “subnormal family” has a reality to it that the mind used to normality really struggles to adapt to, often taxing the victim when they aren’t able to hold onto the comprehension and try to the normative response again, that friends and family should act a certain way. But then they are met with the evidence they don’t. That’s subnormality. It is below, not different, than the norm. pg. 181
They also describe how Lyft was involved with torture. They knew that the woman was doing everything right and was even studying how to be believed by the Trust and Safety team, and yet they didn’t. They didn’t just to do it. That is truly disgusting. It needs to be put out of its misery. Pg. 201 It is true that these things continue until the abused is vindicated. When they aren’t and are run through the system, there is usually one thing at play; extreme envy. Do not doubt the capacity for abnormal and disturbing extreme envy in the immediate family. Sometimes they will even admit it. That’s more towards the “constant betrayal as subnormality” point. The usual family bonding infrastructure, such as love, serotonin, and oxytocin, has fallen to a pathological, abnormal and monstrous extreme envy found on the subnormal family. The family essentially can’t carry water. “While her abuser was never apprehended, this wasn’t because she was distrusted or faulted or disregarded. The collective response validated and vindicated her, so that Hogshead-Makar could heal.” pg. 206.
“If you take my pen and say you are sorry, but don’t give me the pen back, nothing has happened.” pg. 209. This is what I’m saying about the publication pipeline when the actual book is really and actually going to speak about victim compensation on all that. Rapists or assailants may also interpret trying to punish the woman more than the man as the man being too good looking to be charged. It is usually the opposite case. That’s how you get these Weinstein 10, Victim 0 deranged comments, even if they meant political power. These lunatics conflate political power with beauty. Ask any femcel, they will say xyz is more powerful that abc because of beauty. When in fact it is money that has more to do with it. People will call anybody with enough money beautiful; someone without it, you’d have to actually be that way. Overall, I really can’t afford to give this book two stars for the surrounding conditions in which it came about, and if they hadn’t existed, I might have given it a five stars. Everything it said was right, but it did it in a tit-for-tat kind of way that evaded consent that has to stop. It smelled of monetizing illegal investigations into victims coming forward. This has to stop. It needs to be investigated. I can’t keep investigating by myself. They cannot speak on victim compensation, doubly raping the victim, and then do it themselves, only to claim a needs based economy. Let me guess; two teenagers. That’s a needs based economy. This has to stop. This is not how you run a long term functioning and successful economy. Every person that engages in an act like that is at least a little bit responsible for the ongoing crash and burn here.
The whole thing just smelled like impulse control disorder and it stinks to high heaven of a publication pipelines. It needs. To. Stop. I need the forces behind this to get it under control and if they can’t to step down. Weinstein investigations and monetizing them to Israel pipelines often given data by Chinese illegal Bitcoin mining operations are often the culprits. This needs to stop. It is all impulse control disorder.
This book is WORTH READING. However, the conditions it came about in need to be investigated. I assume all that happened here will be rationalized as most people who don’t have it tend to do.
Read the book, but investigate the conditions about which it came about. It stinks to high heaven. Don’t accept fake or half-assed investigators. I really can’t afford to give this two stars given the content, nor can I afford to give it five. Four I can’t do because that’s more so its merit on the content but then the conditions bring it down to three.
It’s worth reading, but this has to stop. They are literally undermining and making a mockery of the whole argument just from compulsive abuse and misogyny; because they’re addicted to it and used to it. It just has to stop. Such a person doesn’t even basically have it. It just has. To. Stop.
The sofia and baliga thing is just pathetic. It's just. Absolutely. Fcking. Pathetic. Make. It. Stop. People don't come forward because they didn't know how they ultimately felt. But the "race to the victim" position Olympics is just. vomit. Just. vomit. The rape as beauty narrative, that all the beautiful just get rape and how being beautiful means it's inevitable is. just. vomit. Even if it's true, make it stop, don't make it a token to be shared among your friends. I do EVERYTHING to make it stop. Make it stop. This is hands down the most absolutely. fcking. pathetic. thing I have ever seen. I mean it. I'm not trying to be mean. Make. It. Stop.
"Voluntary intoxication". Even if you're a minor. Make. It. Stop. They will literally push you out until bars are the only place you can go if you don't put out. Make. It. Stop. Do not underestimate the trafficker trash sh*t.
Even the police's advice that they agree to a date with the victim and see if they can get him to do it again is just. Vomit. Literal revictimization. I don't care if the victim is willing to do it.
Rape does not mean you're beautiful.
Beauty doesn't mean you're powerful.
Power is not beauty.
Money is power.
Money happens by data pipelines like this, that are straight up on pure rape dynamics.
That has nothing to do with beauty, and rape has nothing to do with it either. Beauty contests aren't won because you're raped enough times. I wouldn't wish rape on my worst enemy. True rape.
Make. It. Stop.